The Canon XF Professional Camcorder features MPEG-2 50Mbps recording to Compact Flash (CF) cards captured through a Genuine Canon HD. View and Download Canon XF instruction manual online. HD Camcorder. XF Camcorder pdf manual download. Also for: Xf The Canon XF/XF HD Camcorder has been designed to For details on using the software, refer to the instruction manual (PDF file).
|Language:||English, Spanish, German|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
File name: guardtertorsmaxbank.ml; File version: Canon Marketing( Philippines) Inc. makes no guarantees of any kind with regard to. Download drivers, software, firmware and manuals for your Canon product and get access to online technical support resources and Canon XF Tests and settings on a Canon XF/ Tests were made There are neutral filters for exposure control, and manual control of the lens. Sensitivity is rather.
Frame Recording This mode allows recording from a single frame to a small group of frames every time the shutter is pressed preferably remotely released to avoid camera shake. Useful for Claymation and other forms of animation. This then produces either slow motion or fast motion in your final footage, depending on whether this speed is faster or slower than your set shooting speed. Note that speeds over 30 FPS can only be set when shooting in X resolution.
Pre Recording Pre Recording sets the camera so that it is constantly recording to a three second memory buffer. When you actually press the shutter release the camera starts recording from that moment but it also includes the previous three seconds. This way you can start shooting and still capture something that happened prior to pressing the shutter release. Having to wade through menus for these controls is a crying shame on such an otherwise well designed camera.
My response to them is —get over it. The reason is clear, as will be seen when we do some side-by-side comparisons.
By using smaller sensors Canon was able to use a smaller lens for equivalent coverage, with all of the ancillary benefits that this provides. Has Canon pulled this off? But I will mention what is so often overlooked in both still and video digital comparisons. Image quality is a composite of factors, and just comparing specs, or one feature or another, tells us nothing useful.
Not to stress an analogy, but the best cookies result not just from the use of quality ingredients, but as importantly how well they are baked together. The mount is worth mentioning because it has two notable aspects, one positive, one negative.
The bad news is that the mount is designed for large diameter mics, not the narrow ones most people use. Pretty standard stuff.
This is a much more clever design that the guarded wheels which are so often difficult to set and all to easy to accidentally mis-set. On the audio front my only complaint is that when the "Instant Reply" button is pressed there is no audio from the headphone jacks — video only is displayed.
I want to be able to review the audio as well as the video. Is the audio not equally important? It is claimed to provide between and minutes of either playback or recording at maximum data rate.
There is a larger accessory battery, the 7, mAh BP, which I recommend as the preferred choice for a second battery because of its extra capacity.
Both of these batteries are of a new "intelligent" design, which allows the camera to accurately forecast remaining capacity, charge state, and which have four LEDs embedded to show the state of charge when outside the camera. This is an esthetic issue as much as anything else, but I imagine that there is an extra element of water and dust resistance along with this design choice.
Many competitive camera have their batteries simply hanging off the back. Camera makers are, of course, free to declare 0db at whatever level they wish. In mid to highlight tones there is little real-world difference between these three settings.
But if you look carefully at the dark bottle in the bottom-center of the frame you can clearly see the difference that these settings make. Also have a look at this noise level comparison between the XF and the Sony EX1, as described later in this review. What is seen is that the XF series appear to have about a one stop noise advantage over the EX cameras,at the same numeric gain setting.
So, if you ignore the gain numbers and simply go by comparable noise characteristics at various sensitivity settings one can argue that the Canon and the Sony are roughly matched in terms of noise when used at similar light levels. A few of these, in addition to everything listed above are… Face Detection For run-and-gun shooters face detection may be just the ticket.
Stills If you program one of the 13 programmable buttons to be a Stills button then you can take a still photograph while filming. You can also do this when playing back footage, also using the Photo button on the included wireless remote control.
Stills shot will be the same resolution as the video — no hokey interpolation applied. You can do that in Photoshop later if you wish, or need to. Stills are saved to the SD card. This save the need to download a version with a prism inverter, saving money. But, anyone looking for a camera in this price and feature range will invariably compare them to the Sony CineAlta EX series, which have dominated this market segment for the past few years.
Chris and I have owned a couple of EX1s almost since they first appeared, and have been using them to produce our travel documentaries and training videos. In mid-July Chris and I spent a day shooting a variety of subjects to try and discover how these cameras compared under a range of shooting situations, subject and light conditions. We compared the cameras in a number of different ways, some objective and some subjective.
No matter how carefully one sets up a comparison, someone will find fault with it. Why did you leave that out?
Handling This is, of course, highly subjective. Chris has been cursing the hand-holdability of the EX1 from day one. I suggest that you try both brands for yourselves to see how they feel inyour hands. The XF is a larger camera than the EX1. It also weighs 5. Yet remarkably, itfeelslighter, possible because of its better balance. Control interface is a highly subjective matter. Resolution and Lens Quality Both cameras produce very high resolution images, but those from the Canon subjectively have an edge over the Sony.
Pixel peepers may wish to do their own comparisons. Picture Quality Picture quality is a catch-all that encompasses not just lens performance but also colour rendering, noise, dynamic range, sensitivity and more. We should also point out that with so many factors influencing overall image quality, it was hard to know whether to use custom picture profiles on each of the cameras when doing comparisons.
The XF has only been on the market for a short while, and I know of no Custom Profiles that are available, unlike for the EX1, for which there are a great many. So — what to do? In the end we decided that we would compare both cameras without profiles. Each camera was set to its default rendering — for better or worse. The test footage linked above should speak for itself. At 0db the cameras are quite comparable.
No significant difference in dynamic range was noted, in this or other tests.
This caused me to investigate the -6db setting on the XF, which indeed did generate a slightly cleaner image. This can be seen in noise level test clip shown earlier. The lower setting not so much for its very slight noise improvement but also as a way of avoiding having to dial in ND to keep a wide aperture for narrower DOF, and to avoid diffraction in bright light conditions.
The XF is that clean. Other Factors We tested sensitivity to "flashing" issues when footage is shot in the presence of electronic flash such as at a concert , and both cameras display it. What concerns some people is that CMOS sensors, because of the way that they scan the image tend to show a partially flashed frame, which is less appealing than a completely flashed one.
At higher shutter speeds it might be, but our perspective is that this is not something to be overly concerned about for most shooters. Image skewing is another negative characteristic of CMOS sensors, and our tests showed both cameras to be comparable in this regard. Unless a fast shutter speed is used, motion strobing is likely to be far more noticeable artifact than skewing jello , and good cinematographers know how to cope with this in any event.
Not something that we worry about overly. Their combination of features, image quality and build quality make them a very strong competitor against comparable offerings from Sony, Panasonic and JVC. Canon is to be praised for producing such a well-rounded and high performing product in the light of the strong competition.
There is no software for the OS Version you selected. There is no firmware for the OS version you selected. There is no utility for the OS Version you selected. Search Our Knowledge Base Please enter your question: There are no Recommended Downloads available. This Limited Warranty covers all defects encountered in normal use of the Equipment and does not apply in the following cases: Loss or damage to the Equipment due to abuse, mishandling, accident, improper maintenance, or failure to follow operating instructions; If the Equipment is defective as a result of leaking batteries, sand, dirt or water damage; If defects or damages are caused by the use of unauthorized parts or by service other than by Canon USA's factory service centers or authorized service facilities; This Limited Warranty does not cover cabinet exterior finish , video cassette tape, head cleanings, nor does it apply to Equipment downloadd outside the United States.
Main Unit Specs. Standard Definition or High Definition. Power Supply rated. Video Recording system. MXF Recording Modes: Audio Recording system. Image Sensor. Total Pixels. Effective Pixels. Maximum recording Time. Focusing System.
Max Shutter Speed. Minimum Focusing Distance. White Balance. Frame Rate.
Minimum Illumination. Full AUTO mode: Image Stabilization.
Standard, Powered, Dynamic, Off. Filter Diameter. LCD Screen. Recording Media. CF Card: USB Terminal. Video Terminal. Output only Composite: Audio Terminal.
HDMI Terminal. Operating Temperature range. Weight not including lens hood and eyecup. Firmware Version 1. Was this helpful? YES NO. Expand All. Support for the 3x and 6x Digital Tele-converter settings has been added.
The polarity of the XLR terminal has been modified to improve compatibility with external audio devices. The pin configuration has been modified to be consistent with the description in the Instruction Manual.
Before the Firmware update, the pin configuration for the XLR jack was pin1: shield, pin2: cold, pin3: hot. After the Firmware update, the pin configuration for the XLR jack will be pin1: shield, pin2: hot, pin3: cold. The firmware update will avoid the scenario where use of the unit in combination with a device of different polarity than the XLR terminals would result in reduced sound levels due to a reversal of the phase relationship.
Adds the x 35 Mbps setting to the camcorder's recording modes. Displays the Korean language. Adds a focal length guide to display the focal length position in a numeric value and a function to make fine adjustments to the camcorder's optical axis to serve as an assistance function for 3D shooting. Adds double slot recording where the same clip can be simultaneously recorded to two CF cards.